You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.

Would you mind explaining your recent edits to pages like Tommy McAvoy and Ian McDiarmid. At first I thought it was vandalism, but on second thought it looks like you had a purpose in mind. However I can't work out what it was. AlistairMcMillan 21:14, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Yes, I'm also curious why you're changing the capitaliations in the categories for names like McWilliams and MacCarthy. What are we missing? Thanks --BaronLarf 23:16, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC) Yes, I'm also curious why you're changing the capitaliations in the categories for names like McWilliams and MacCarthy. What are we missing? Thanks --BaronLarf 23:16, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)

Simple really. In wikiworld (and a lot of others) McWilliams is not the same as Mcwilliams alphabetically. Bornintheguz 23:20, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

And yet the capitalization stays the same in the categories. Interesting. Thanks for the insight.--BaronLarf 23:28, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)

But that doesn't explain you're changes categorization of MacNames to McNames. older≠wiser 03:12, Jan 8, 2005 (UTC)

Not entirely sure what you mean but if what I think you mean is right see my reply to AlistairMcMillan Bornintheguz 15:06, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Yes, that is it--it is by no means a universal practice (sorting McNames as if they were MacNames) and it is certainly not what I expect when looking through a directory. This has come up before (see User:SimonMayer/Mac-Mc) and as I recall there was no consensus about it then. I do not think it is a good idea to systematically make such changes without some consensus about it. older≠wiser 19:44, Jan 8, 2005 (UTC)

Hey, I saw that you edited the Martyn Bennett article. What does the change you made do? Thanks --Paraphelion 03:52, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I have the same question about Victor A. McKusick. You actually changed the spelling of his last name to an incorrect form (Mackusick is not accurate). I'd like to understand what you were trying to... JFW | T@lk 19:53, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

See my reply to AlistairMcMillan's question and my reply to Paraphelion's question. Bornintheguz 20:03, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Any particular reason for adding Category:English Civil War to Royalist? It's basically a disambiguation page. The relevant article for the English Civil War is Cavaliers (which, I'm afraid, is barely more than a stub). -- Jmabel | Talk 06:55, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)

I notice you've recently been adding clubs like Glentoran and Aberdeen to Category:United Soccer Association teams - I must admit I have never heard of this organisation, and I wonder if something is wrong, since that category is itself included in Category:United States soccer clubs, so obviously something is amiss somewhere! -- Arwel 01:10, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

see User_talk:Arwel_Parry#more_cats_.28meeow.21.29 Bornintheguz 17:31, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

If Sheffield United weren't the first team to be known as "United", who was? I've often heard that Sheffield were the first United and would love to know why I am wrong! Warofdreams 18:15, 9 May 2005 (UTC)reply

see User talk:Warofdreams#Sheffield United F.C Bornintheguz 18:33, 9 May 2005 (UTC)reply

Interesting, and the SUFC article should make this clear, but the claim refers to Sheffield United Cricket Club, its predecessor, who took their name in 1854 (and therefore it is the first sports club to be known as "United", not the first football team) - although earlier examples are very welcome! Warofdreams 18:36, 9 May 2005 (UTC)reply

see User talk:Warofdreams#Sheffield United F.C Bornintheguz 18:43, 9 May 2005 (UTC)reply

Why have you moved the Cardiff UCCE and Bradford/Leeds UCCE pages? Have you seen something about them being renamed? If so, what? And also if so, that wouldn't change the names they played under in old games. Finally - can we have solidi in page titles, I thought they mucked something up, which is why I went for Bradford&Leeds in the title. Kind regards, jguk 11:21, 30 May 2005 (UTC)reply

see User_talk:Jguk/Archive6#Moves_of_cricket_pages Bornintheguz 14:30, 31 May 2005 (UTC)reply

Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 23:30, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)

I've changed the category entry back to "M. J. K. Smith" simply because I can't think of anyone who'd look under "Michael John Knight" for this player. Loganberry (Talk) 18:31, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hi,

I'm not fussed about whether "in similar circumstances" stays in the article or not, but I'm puzzled by your comment that the circumstances were "hardly similar." I realise that Glazer hasn't moved the club (yet?) but as both clubs were formed by disgruntled supporters after a twat took over their club, the circumstances seem fairly similar to me. Just wondering why you think otherwise. CTOAGN 8 July 2005 20:52 (UTC)

I noticed you've made a lot of edits to football articles and wondered if you'd like to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Football. It's still new and there isn't a lot happening yet, but we're hoping to get things like a football collaboration of the (week/fortnight/whatever) going soon.

CTOAGN 19:04, 21 July 2005 (UTC)reply

Greetings. Are you aware that it seems Wikipedia is being hoaxed in the Plymouth article at least concerning the putative existence and contributions of one "Lee Brook?" While it may be fodder for BJAODN, it really isn't appropriate for an encyclopaedia. Your attention to this matter will be appreciated. Regards, Fire Star 14:54, 3 August 2005 (UTC)reply

If this is a genuine project you're interested in, such as your articles on Plymouth (Argyle) F.C.'s results by season, and so long as we can have backing from others, I wouldn't mind joining you in collecting all of these results together. Looks like one heck of a project, what do you think?

I'll try and get something up on my Sandbox in due course to see if what we have in mind is more or less the same thing..

Otherwise, for completionists like ourselves, it looks like something could get going here..! Bobo192|Edits

Zdroj:https://en.wikipedia.org?pojem=User_talk:Bornintheguz
Text je dostupný za podmienok Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0 Unported; prípadne za ďalších podmienok. Podrobnejšie informácie nájdete na stránke Podmienky použitia.

---