The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:37, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Environment Coastal & Offshore

Environment Coastal & Offshore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Trade publication of unclear notability. Doesn't seem to have any coverage other than in WP:PRIMARY sources. If not delete, it should be pared down to a stub. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Environment, and Florida. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Scholar search turns up very few citations in other journals or publications, and therefore fails WP:NMAG. Article relies entirely upon sources that are WP:PRIMARY and not WP:INDEPENDENT. Bgv. (talk) 06:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.