The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Ed Forest

Ed Forest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page for many years. I'm not seeing refs to consider but perhaps they exist in languages I can't read. JMWt (talk) 09:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Norway and Sweden. JMWt (talk) 09:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment and Geography. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 14:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

• Delete I think this is just an old mis-translation. Eidskog (described in this article as a town near there) translates roughly as "Ed Forest". Google just returns people of this name, and ChatGPT refers to the "Eidskog forest" in the area instead. Walsh90210 (talk) 00:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
• Comment: I found what seems like a relevant reference: an article in Svensk geografisk årsbok from 1951 (not available digitally). I found a web page that discusses thar article, which confirms that it's the right forest . Andejons (talk) 10:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

  Ok, I can't get that to load but I'm going to assume good faith. As you can see it, would you think it meets the criteria of substantial coverage in a RS? JMWt (talk) 10:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

  It seems to have a 15-page article devoted to it published in a scholarly annual. I'm not sure if that is usually seen as enough for notability. Andejons (talk) 12:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

  Right. I don't usually consider references that nobody has read, but that does sound quite long JMWt (talk) 12:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Delete per nom. 104.7.152.180 (talk) 14:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.