Companies Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments

This template was nominated for deletion on December 13, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

I've only included subsidiaries / majority-owned companies, not companies where Berkshire Hathaway has a minority stake, like Coca-Cola and PetroChina. --Crocodile Punter 11:34, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

right only wholy owned subsidiaries, I changed Chase to Decker (sorry to see him go) Pohick2 (talk) 23:39, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

by adding all the newspapers (former Media General papers from here ). I know, the infobox is much less pretty (useful?) now.

Should the World-Herald Co. and Media World have their own articles? They are "sister companies" under BH Media Group; the W-H Co. subsidiary Midlands Newspapers owns most of the properties on its branch. Maybe only "major" newspapers should be listed.

Buffalo and Business Wire are separate, AFAIK. Woodshed (talk) 19:04, 29 June 2012 (UTC)