This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sociology: Social Movements This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the social movements task force. Climate change This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide Environment This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Just noting that this page, as first released, is a near direct translation of the Germany equivalent at de:Hungern bis ihr ehrlich seid. With best wishes. RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 08:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

For future reference perhaps. RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 16:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

• collapse by Tin 

• Sona (female) joins strike on 11 June 

List of hunger strikers and durations as at 13 June 2024:

Notes

1. the dates in the Events column may be a day or so wrong as it is hard to gain consistent and accurate timestamps
2. this table may well not be current and complete
3. entries ordered by date of pubic announcement
4. day counts given in bold orange are final — meaning the striker has finished their protest
5. day counts given in teal green are paused strikes (whatever that exactly means?)
6. the Days column uses the age in days template and is current at the time of the last edit but is not fully dynamic — a trivial edit may therefore be necessary to refresh these duration values

trivial edit to ensure currency: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 07:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Press release:

• press release dated 20 May 2024 for press conference on 23 May 2024 10:00 +0200 (CEST)

Update: it appears that little has changed following the press conference:

• instagram

RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 09:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Groll (2024) quite possibly covers the legal aspects.¹ The part that I can access translates thus:

Climate activists in Berlin have been protesting with a hunger strike since March. Now one of them could even die. Doctors have abdicated responsibility. Are they allowed to do that?

The man is completely emaciated. ...

Best, RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 17:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC)reply

Eicke Weber is a solid state physicist and key player in the scientific development of photovoltaics in Germany. Weber was director of the Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems (ISE) for ten years. He spoke in support at a hunger strike press conference on 23 May 2024 (video archived on YouTube: www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2sPlywjXLA). Best, RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 17:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)reply

@Drmies: Please discuss your recently removed material here. For instance, the quiet visit of economics minister Robert Habeck is certainly significant. And I believe that passage should be retained. Your remark about "keeping it real. we are not the strike's website" is not especially focused or helpful in this context. TIA, RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 15:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply

• I believe it is. How many pictures did I remove? A dozen? Two dozen? Images should support the text; articles should not be photo galleries. The article is way too much a collection of news items. Drmies (talk) 15:53, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply

  I am going to argue that photo galleries are reasonable in this context and that none of the images were duplicates or irrelevant to the article. One of the problems with Wikipedia markup (as I understand it) is that individual images are difficult to reference from within the text. Now if you believe that some images were unnecessary, why not discuss what would be a reasonable short list here? That would be good process?

  Now turning to the Robert Habeck material that was removed. The German federal economics minister visited the strikers when the German chancellor had declined to engage in any substantive way. I believe that material is entirely relevant and significant and should be reinstated? Or alternatively, your reasoning for its removal should be argued in detail.

  I will concede the article should be compressed but these are current events (but not breaking news) and the benefit of hindsight is not yet present to provide a better account. I intend to do exactly that as things unfold.

  Why then, I ask, do you not contribute to that process of distillation, rather than just roll back recent edits in what seems a random and arbitrary fashion. Did you look at the source material for that Habeck paragraph? Did you evaluate it for substance and accuracy. The one minute residency on the commit log suggests not. RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 17:02, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply

  Information regarding the reaction of Robert Habeck is certainly relevant as he is the Vice Chancellor of Germany. Thus, he is the deputy of the person addressed by the campaign (Olaf Scholz). Jesse Maierhof (talk) 16:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)reply

  I would agree that 19 photos is far too many for this article. The photos fill the entire right side of the article and certainly look like a gallery. The purpose of images is to help the reader to understand the content of the article. This many images is unnecessary for that purpose and far out of line with typical articles of this type. CodeTalker (talk) 20:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)reply

  If editors think it's reasonable/helps the article, a gallery section like at History of Diving Museum can be used. General guidance at WP:GALLERY. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply

Should probably be just "Starving for honesty". Any objection? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply

I do not have any objections, while noting that I provided the original naming. The German version just uses the straight name too with no additional information. RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 16:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)reply

DW 1 calls it "Starve until you are honest". What is the WP:COMMONNAME in English? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply

Please note that the hunger strikers revised their demands at press conference 09 on 3 June 2024. Demand 1 remains, demand 2 as below (with unofficial translation), and demands 3 and 4 have be struck. So from four to two demands now.

• "Es gibt kein CO2-Restbudget mehr, dann es sind bereits jetzt hunderte Gigatonnen zu viel CO2 in der Luft." "There is no longer a remaining CO₂ budget because there are already hundreds of gigatonnes too much CO₂ in the air."

For reference, see the archived live‑stream of that press conference on YouTube: www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QY0DKY3X-A

Best, RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 07:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply

UPDATE: their website now lists these three demands:

1. The continued existence of human civilization is extremely endangered by the climate catastrophe.

2. There is no longer any remaining CO2 budget because there are already hundreds of gigatons viz too much CO2 in the air.

3. We have to radically change course now, even if it is years late

RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 12:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply

Without being aware of this talk page section, I have made an edit on the revised demands already.--CRau080 (talk) 21:48, 9 June 2024 (UTC)reply

Chidgk1 added a query to the main text with the commit message "Where does the IPCC say that climate change is an existential threat to human civilisation?". Commit diff.

I will go looking in the next day or so. In the interim, two comments. IPCC contributors certainly raise that prospect, see Carrington (2024). While noting that individual contributors do not constitute the IPCC. And I know Hans Joachim Schellnhuber agrees with that sentiment too. But again, Schellnhuber is not the IPCC. We need to search the AR6 WGII report and the Summary for Policymakers (SPM) publication. At a last resort, I can ask Scientist Rebellion who are supporting this action. We need a reliable secondary source, of course. Others are welcome to explore this question too.

• Carrington, Damian (8 May 2024). "World's top climate scientists expect global heating to blast past 1.5C target". The Guardian. London, United Kingdom. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2024-06-09.

Best, RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 20:20, 11 June 2024 (UTC)reply

How about this from the one page Forward from the main report of WGII (page vii) (emphasis added) (the "we" refers to the two authors who wrote the forward):¹

Climate change is a long-term challenge, but the need for urgent action now is clear. The conclusion of the report's Summary for Policymakers summarizes this succinctly. 'The cumulative scientific evidence is unequivocal: climate change is a threat to human well-being and planetary health. Any further delay in concerted anticipatory global action on adaptation and mitigation will miss a brief and rapidly closing window of opportunity to secure a livable and sustainable future for all.' We couldn't agree more.

Best, RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 10:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply

@Chidgk1: does that suffice as a source? RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 10:39, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply

Whilst interesting I don't think that quote is talking about Societal collapse Chidgk1 (talk) 14:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply

I searched some more and think the IPCC probably does not explicitly cover existential threat. Wikipedia offers an article on Climate change and civilizational collapse. And other authors examine the topic.² I would be happy to see the remark about IPCC support removed. RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 15:25, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply

I asked a mathematician today who attends the German IPCC national meetings and they were unable to recall an IPCC reference to "existential threat". RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 13:37, 13 June 2024 (UTC)reply

removed Chidgk1 (talk) 16:12, 13 June 2024 (UTC)reply