Skip to: Table of contents Current nominations To be closed More input needed Recently closed Suspended candidates

Featured pictures are images that add significantly to articles, either by illustrating article content particularly well, or being eye-catching to the point where users will want to read its accompanying article. Taking the adage that "a picture is worth a thousand words", the images featured on Wikipedia:Featured pictures should illustrate a Wikipedia article in such a way as to add significantly to that article, according to the featured picture criteria. Promoting an image If you believe an image should be featured, create a subpage (use the "For Nominations" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section. For promotion, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers in support and the consensus is in its favor, it can be added to the Wikipedia:Featured pictures list. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-thirds majority in support, including the nominator and/or creator of the image; however, anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets. All users may comment. However, only those who have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and with at least 100 edits will be included in the numerical count. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. Nominations started in December are given three extra days, due to the holidays slowing down activity here. The archive contains all opinions and comments collected for candidate nominations and their nomination results. If you nominate an image here, please consider also uploading and nominating it at Commons to help ensure that the pictures can be used not just in the English Wikipedia but on all other Wikimedia projects as well. Delisting an image A featured picture can be nominated for delisting if you feel it no longer lives up to featured picture standards. You may also request a featured picture be replaced with a superior image. Create a subpage (use the "For Delists" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section. Please leave a note on the talk page of the original FPC nominator (and creator/uploader, if appropriate) to let them know the delisting is being debated. The user may be able to address the issues and avoid the delisting of the picture. For delisting, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers supporting a delist or replace, and the consensus is in its favor, it will be delisted from Wikipedia:Featured pictures. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-thirds majority in support, including the nominator. Note that anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets. However, images are sometimes delisted despite having fewer than five in support of their removal, and there is currently no consensus on how best to handle delist closures, except that:If the image to be delisted is not used in any articles by the time of closure, it must be delisted. If it is added to articles during the nomination, at least one week's stability is required for the nomination to be closed as "Kept". The nomination may be suspended if a week hasn't yet passed to give the rescue a chance. Outside of the nominator, all voters are expected to have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and to have made a minimum of 100 edits. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. As with regular nominations, delist nominations are given three extra days to run if started in December. Note that delisting an image does not mean deleting it. Delisting from Featured pictures in no way affects the image's status in its article(s).

Shortcuts WP:FPC WP:FIC Featured content: Featured articles Featured lists Featured pictures ← On Wikimedia Commons Featured topics Featured picture tools: Featured picture criteria Featured picture candidates Nomination procedure On Wikimedia Commons Featured picture candidates archive Featured pictures thumbs Picture of the day Picture of the day archive Random featured picture

How to comment for Candidate Images Write Support, if you approve of the picture. A reason is optional. Write Oppose, followed by your reasoning, if you disapprove of the picture. All objections should be accompanied by a specific rationale that, if addressed, would make you support the image. If your concern is one that can only be addressed by the creator, and if they haven't nominated or commented on the image, and if they are a Wikipedian, you should notify them directly. You can weak support or weak oppose instead, so that your opinion will be weighed as half of a "full" opinion. To change your opinion, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it. If you think a nominated image obviously fails the featured picture criteria, write Speedy close followed by your reasons. Nominations may be closed early if this is the case. Recommendations added early in the process may be disregarded if they do not address concerns and/or improvements that arise later in the debate. Reviewers are advised to monitor the progress of a nomination and update their votes accordingly. Prior to giving an opinion, the image should be assessed on its quality as displayed at full size (high-resolution) in an image editing program. Please note that the images are only displayed at thumbnail size on this page. The thumbnail links to the image description page which, in turn, links to the high-resolution version. How to comment for Delist Images Write Keep, followed by your reasons for keeping the picture. Write Delist, followed by your reasons for delisting the picture. Write Delist and Replace if you believe the image should be replaced by a better picture. You can weak keep, weak delist or weak delist and replace instead, so that your opinion will be weighed as half of a "full" opinion. To change your opinion, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it. Please remember to be civil, not to bite the newbies and to comment on the image, not the person. You may find the glossary useful when you encounter acronyms or jargon in other voters' comments. You can also link to it by using {{FPCgloss}}. Editing candidates If you feel you could improve a candidate by image editing, please feel free to do so, but do not overwrite or remove the original. Instead, upload your edit with a different file name (e.g., add "edit" to the file name), and display it below the original nomination. Edits should be appropriately captioned in sequential order (e.g., Edit 1, Edit 2, etc), and describe the modifications that have been applied. Is my monitor adjusted correctly? In a discussion about the brightness of an image, it is necessary to know if the computer display is properly adjusted. Displays differ greatly in their ability to show shadow detail. There are four dark grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display shadow detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings. Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal shadow detail. Please take this into account when voting. Displays also differ greatly in their ability to show highlight detail. There are light grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display highlight detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings (probably reduce the contrast setting). Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal highlight detail. Please take this into account when voting. On a gamma-adjusted display, the four circles in the color image blend into the background when seen from a few feet (roughly 75–150 cm) away. If they do not, you could adjust the gamma setting (found in the computer's settings, not on the display), until they do. This may be very difficult to attain, and a slight error is not detrimental. Uncorrected PC displays usually show the circles darker than the background. Note that the image must be viewed in original size (263 × 68 pixels) - if enlarged or reduced, results are not accurate. Note that on most consumer LCD displays (laptop or flat screen), viewing angle strongly affects these images. Correct adjustment on one part of the screen might be incorrect on another part for a stationary head position. Click on the images for more technical information. If possible, calibration with a hardware monitor calibrator is recommended.

To see recent changes, purge the page cache.

Official Apollo 13 crew photo

Voting period ends on 5 May 2024 at 18:51:20 (UTC)

Reason

The official NASA crew photo, 29 April 1970. All three men of the Apollo 13 crew in the highest quality of studio photographs.

Articles in which this image appears

Apollo 13

FP category for this image

Space, People

Creator

NASA (NASA Image and Video Library Image number S70-36485)
(See: https://images.nasa.gov/details-S70-36485)
(Non-cropped version of image: https://commons.wikimedia.org?pojem=File:The_Actual_Apollo_13_Prime_Crew_-_GPN-2000-001167.jpg)

• Support as nominator – Indefatigable2 ^talk 18:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
• Oppose – Govt. promotional photo that tells nothing about highly perilous Apollo 13 mission. Faces of subjects constitute relatively small proportion of image. – Sca (talk) 12:14, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
• Oppose per Sca. These men weren't known for wearing suits, so the EV is modest here. Commons has several photos of the Apollo 13 crew wearing spacesuits (including one posing while doing so with their rocket) that have stronger EV, though the resolution looks lowish - presumably higher res versions are available. Nick-D (talk) 23:34, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Effusive eruption

Voting period ends on 5 May 2024 at 00:33:09 (UTC)

Reason

Close up view of the Litli-Hrútur eruption in Iceland in 2023. The wow factor does it for me. It’s a good addition to three articles listed below. It can also be added to the Fagradalsfjall article if there is consensus for it.

Articles in which this image appears

Effusive eruption, Lava, Volcano

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Geology

Creator

Giles Laurent

• Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 00:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
• Support - Yes, it's a good video. --Janke | Talk 08:11, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
• Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 09:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
• Support – Yann (talk) 11:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
• Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 22:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
• Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 22:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 06:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Double selfie

Voting period ends on 4 May 2024 at 02:59:52 (UTC)

Reason

An excellent quality scan (a part of Google Art Project), with good EV.

Articles in which this image appears

Jean Baptiste de Champaigne and Nicolas de Plattemontagne (latter added recently)

FP category for this image

Paintings

Creator

Jean Baptiste de Champaigne and Nicolas de Plattemontagne

• Support as nominator – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:59, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Trillium undulatumedit

Voting period ends on 3 May 2024 at 18:05:52 (UTC)

Reason

Recently featured unanimously on Commons, used in the article's infobox.

Articles in which this image appears

Trillium undulatum, Algonquin Provincial Park

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Flowers

Creator

The Cosmonaut

• Support as nominator – The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Oppose – A good nomination, but there's a decent amount of loss of focus on the petal borders (maybe some stacking can help) and the lighting is a bit off. Also, another angle with less leaves would increase the EV significantly. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply

German External Loan 1924edit

Voting period ends on 2 May 2024 at 19:54:32 (UTC)

Reason

High quality reproduction of a document. Provides a lot of EV in the only article which it appears in, in that it is a direct relic of the Dawes Plan itself. Good POTD for October 15 2024 (100th anniversary of this document).

Articles in which this image appears

Dawes Plan

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/World War I

Creator

Unknown authors and graphic artists; Scan from Ersten Deutschen Historic-Actien-Clubs e.V.

• Support as nominator – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 19:54, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support –  Kentuckian |💬   01:04, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply

  Are the colours natural? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 16:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply

• Conditional support- A good nomination with adequate EV, but (per Adam's query) I came across File:Dawes Anleihe 1924 1000$.jpg and saw the colors are way off in the nom. I am not sure which is closer to the original because a Google search also returned at least half a dozen color reproductions of the bill. If we could get a very good source or a scan (maybe the nomination itself) to prove the current nom is the original/closer to the original color, I'd support. Good luck. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:51, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply

  Now, after searching across various sources, I have discovered many variant scans of this document, even by auction houses. Here is a list of the variants I have discovered:

  • https://www.fhw-online.de/de/FHW-Auktion-101/?AID=88485&AKTIE=Deutsches+Reich%2C+Deutsche+%C4ussere+Anleihe+1924
  • https://www.hwph.de/historische-wertpapiere/losnr-auktnr-pa4-952.html
  • https://www.hwph.de/stocks-bonds/losnr-auktnr-pa9-1116_en.html
  • https://www.hwph.de/stocks-bonds/losnr-auktnr-pa34-461_en.html (PDF containing images)
  • https://www.scripoworld.com/records/germany/germany-1924-7-external-loan-dawes-loan/

  Every one of these scans have slightly different colors, contrast, brightness, whatever. And I am not sure which is the true correct version as I am no scripophile myself. Is it possible that during the printing of the loans that different colors were used? Is it possible that most of these scans are of forgeries? I was unable to find any definitive source for any questions, but a good place to look might be German Dollar Bonds issued between 1924 and 1937 by F. Paul Seabrook. However, I am not able to access the book as it appears the book is not available online or print in any way, shape, or form. This blog post on Tumblr attests to its existence and describes it, but I can't find an entry on Google Books, or WorldCat, or even an ISBN. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 17:04, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply

• Lots of these notes were issues over many years. It makes sense that not all had identical color tones, fine details, etc. The uploader seems legit. They have 2000+ uploads of similar (historic) documents. Translating some of their talk page posts Here shows the uploader is part of a group or informal organization (also see their file 'source' descriptions). I doubt the uploads are manipulated in any significant way. But I don't know much about old prints though. Perhaps Adam can judge the integrity of the uploader's work by looking at some of their other uploads. Bammesk (talk) 02:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply

• Comment As someone who has scanned aging documents extensively, the colours look reasonable to me. The marks along the top edge are in the same range, indicating that whatever has caused the lightening of the paper happened before the damage that resulted in the brown spots. The greens at the top are slightly lighter, while the blacks seem to have held their tone better; if this were artificial, I'd expect the blacks to likewise be lighter. I do feel that the cutout could have been a bit better, however - the bottom still has some unnatural straight lines.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:04, 27 April 2024 (UTC)reply

  You don't find the purple-to-yellow-to-purple gradient off for the background paper? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 22:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC)reply

  It definitely feels more like some sort of uneven fading due to sub-optimal storage than a technical flaw with the scanner. I no longer have the documents, due to changes in my situation, but this certificate and this poster (also on the other side) both had uneven fading. Admittedly, those were on a much browner paper (and indeed the fading is skewed yellow, rather than the green tone of the nomination). I personally don't think the image is FP quality, due to the blemish, but I don't feel like it's beyond the realm of possibility for this scan to be reflective of the document. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply

  Looking at the available images of these documents online, it does seem to be a common issue. This one is clearly not a reproduction of our digital copy (has the full emblem, as well as the tickets) and has similar fading issues.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply

From Copenhagen Stock Exchangeedit

Voting period ends on 2 May 2024 at 13:43:41 (UTC)

Reason

Featured picture on commons. Quality photograph of the painting, provides EV to its pages where its linked to.

Articles in which this image appears

From Copenhagen Stock Exchange, Børsen, Peder Severin Krøyer, Grosserer-Societetet, Sabinus Seidelin

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Photographer: User:Villy Fink Isaksen, Painter: Peder Severin Krøyer

• Support as nominator – Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 13:43, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support. MER-C 18:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 19:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – Good nomination and excellent EV.  Kentuckian |💬   01:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – --Janke | Talk 06:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support - Giles Laurent (talk) 10:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply

Phagocytosisedit

Voting period ends on 1 May 2024 at 15:49:02 (UTC)

Reason

Good visualization of a neutrophil (a type of white blood cell) neutralizing (phagocytosis, or eating) a bacteria in human blood, invitro. Good addition to two articles.

Articles in which this image appears

Phagocytosis, Neutrophil

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Biology

Creator

Andrei Savitsky

• Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 15:49, 21 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – Moonreach (talk) 15:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – Top EV. --Janke | Talk 16:27, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support. MER-C 18:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 19:56, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support yooooo this goes hard. look at that little guy munch. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 19:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support - Giles Laurent (talk) 10:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply

Antiopella cristataedit

Voting period ends on 1 May 2024 at 10:13:15 (UTC)

Reason

Unanimously featured on Commons two weeks ago. Headline image.

Articles in which this image appears

Antiopella cristata

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Molluscs

Creator

Roberto Strafella

• Support as nominator – MER-C 10:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Comment – Perhaps the image should be cropped? There is too much of a dark background. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 19:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Comment – According to EXIF, this was taken with flash. Looks like it's been edited for a spotlight effect, which looks unnatural. --Janke | Talk 06:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Oppose – Good nomination, but per Janke, looks very unnatural.  Kentuckian |💬   14:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply

Ibn Khaldunedit

Voting period ends on 1 May 2024 at 10:06:19 (UTC)

Reason

Featured without opposition on Commons last month. Headline image.

Articles in which this image appears

Ibn Khaldun etc.

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Others

Creator

Reda Kerbouche

• Support as nominator – MER-C 10:06, 21 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – The brick wall's a distraction, but not enough to drop the EV or quality. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 15:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – Personally, I like the brick wall.  Kentuckian |💬   01:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – Moonreach (talk) 14:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support - Giles Laurent (talk) 10:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
•  Question: What is with that wire on right side of face (his left side) ? --Petar Milošević (talk) 16:24, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply

It doesn't look like it belongs there! I say let's edit it out. Bammesk (talk) 02:17, 26 April 2024 (UTC)reply

Manarolaedit

Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2024 at 15:43:18 (UTC)

Reason

Quality image of Manarola, Italy, and surroundings. FP on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Manarola

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban

Creator

Timothy A. Gonsalves

• Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 15:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:52, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – Great picture, high EV. Yann (talk) 15:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support —Bruce1ee^talk 15:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support--Petar Milošević (talk) 17:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support Thanks @Bammesk: for this nomination. --Tagooty (talk) 02:46, 21 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support. MER-C 10:14, 21 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support - Giles Laurent (talk) 10:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply

Impossible color fatigue templateedit

Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2024 at 17:46:35 (UTC)

Reason

This image significantly contributes to its article and allows the reader to understand the topic in a way that they absolutely would not be able to without it. It's cool and useful, and it has clear enough instructions for how to use it. I'm very new to this sort of thing but I think it should be considered, as it's definitely one of Wikipedia's most unique images. (Image is in SVG format)

Articles in which this image appears

Impossible color

FP category for this image

Diagrams, drawings, and maps (Diagrams)

Creator

Zowie

• Support as nominator – TypoEater (talk) 17:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support Moonreach (talk) 15:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply

Always liked this one. It's simple but effective. SupportAdam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 14:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply

• Support - A good demonstration, high EV. --Janke | Talk 20:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support —Bruce1ee^talk 11:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply

Dolderbahn railcar No. 1edit

Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2024 at 12:35:48 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image of a railcar on a rack railway; good EV as the toothed rack rail is clearly visible; lead image in the Dolderbahn rack railway article; recently promoted to FP on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Dolderbahn

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Land

Creator

User:Kabelleger

• Support as nominator – —Bruce1ee^talk 12:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – Yann (talk) 15:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support. MER-C 10:04, 21 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support –The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support - Giles Laurent (talk) 09:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply

Daniel Boone at Cumberland Gapedit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2024 at 02:22:44 (UTC)

Reason

Iconic, high quality painting with high EV. The image does fall a bit short on resolution being 36px away from meeting the criteria, but I don't think that really matters considering the EV.

Articles in which this image appears

Daniel Boone, Wilderness Road, Appalachia, Cumberland Gap, Elizabethton, Tennessee, History of Kentucky, History of Virginia, Transylvania Colony, Rebecca Boone, Cherokee-American wars, Upland South, American pioneer,

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History

Creator

George Caleb Bingham

• Support as nominator –  ⚜ Kentuckian ⚜  | talk to me 02:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Oppose - Good nomination and excellent EV, but sadly this is not a good scan. Even if we forget the below par resolution, the colors are way off the original (see here). If you can find an alt scan with a higher resolution and better color to the original, I'd consider supporting. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Oppose per above. MER-C 10:15, 21 April 2024 (UTC)reply

Lady Cockburn and Her Three Eldest Sonsedit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2024 at 01:53:31 (UTC)

Reason

High quality and resolution. Good digitization.

Articles in which this image appears

Lady Cockburn and Her Three Eldest Sons, Joshua Reynolds etc.

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Joshua Reynolds

• Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 01:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:32, 21 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support. MER-C 10:35, 21 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support –  Kentuckian |💬   01:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support - Giles Laurent (talk) 09:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply

Isabella I of Castileedit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2024 at 01:44:16 (UTC)

Reason

High quality portrait of an historical ruler. Good digitization.

Articles in which this image appears

Isabella I of Castile, Granada War, Expulsion of Jews from Spain etc.

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Royalty and nobility

Creator

Author unknown

• Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 01:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – "why so serious?" The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:36, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support per nom. Brandmeister^talk 18:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support - Giles Laurent (talk) 09:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply

Nominations in this category are older than ten days and are to be closed. New votes will no longer be accepted.

These nominations have been moved here because consensus is impossible to determine without additional input from those who participated in the discussion. Usually this is because there was more than one edit of the image available, and no clear preference for one of them was determined. If you voted on these images previously, please update your vote to specify which edit(s) you are supporting.

A script is available that automates the majority of these tasks: User:Jujutacular/closeFPC

When NOT promoted, perform the following:

1. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:

   {{FPCresult|Not promoted| }} --~~~~

   • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.

2. If the nominator is new to FPC, consider placing {{subst:NotpromotedFPC|Image name}} on their talk page. To avoid overuse, do not use the template when in doubt.

When promoted, perform the following:

1. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:

   {{FPCresult|Promoted|File:FILENAME.JPG}} --~~~~

   • Replace FILENAME.JPG with the name of the file that was promoted. It should show up as:

   Promoted File:FILENAME.JPG

   • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.

2. Add the image to:
   • Template:Announcements/New featured content - newest on top, remove the oldest so that 15 are listed at all times.
   • Wikipedia:Goings-on - newest on bottom.
   • Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs - newest on top.
3. Add the image to the proper sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on top.

   The caption for a Wikipedian created image should read "Description at Article, by Creator". For a non-Wikipedian, it should be similar, but if the creator does not have an article, use an external link if appropriate. For images with substantial editing by one or more Wikipedians, but created by someone else, use "Description at Article, by Creator (edited by Editor)" (all editors involved should be clear from the nomination). Additionally, the description is optional - if it's essentially the same as the article title, then just use "Article, by Creator". Numerous examples can be found on the various Featured Pictures subpages.

4. Add the image to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on left and remove the oldest from the right so that there are always three in each section.
5. Add the Featured Picture tag and star to the image page using {{Featured picture|page_name}} (replace page_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the page_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/page_name). To add this template you most likely will have to click the "create" button on the upper right if the "edit" button is not present, generally if the image originates from Commons.
6. If an edited or alternative version of the originally nominated image is promoted, make sure that all articles contain the Featured Picture version, as opposed to the original.
7. Notify the nominator or co-nominators by placing {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:file_name.xxx}} on each nominator's talk page. For example: {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.
8. If the image was created by a Wikipedian, place {{subst:UploadedFP|File:file_name.xxx}} on the creator's talk page. For example: {{subst:UploadedFP|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.

Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:

1. Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}} to the top of the section.
2. Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the April archive. This is done by simply adding the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}} from this page to the bottom of the archive.
3. If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.

Note that delisting an image does not equal deleting it. Delisting from Featured pictures in no way affects the image's status in its article/s.

If consensus is to KEEP featured picture status, and the image is used in at least one article, perform the following:

1. Check that the image has been in the article for at least one week. Otherwise, suspend the nomination to give it time to stabilize before continuing.
2. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:

   {{FPCresult|Kept|}} --~~~~

   • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.

3. Optionally leave a note on the picture's talk page.

If consensus is to DELIST, or the image is unused (and consensus is not for a replacement that is used), perform the following:

1. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:

   {{FPCresult|Delisted|}} --~~~~

   • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.

2. Replace the {{Featured picture}} tag from the image with {{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}.
3. Remove the image from the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs.

If consensus is to REPLACE (and at least one of the images is used in articles), perform the following:

1. Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:

   {{FPCresult|Replaced|}} with File:NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG --~~~~

   • Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
   • Replace NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG with the name of the replacement file.

2. Replace the {{Featured picture}} tag from the delisted image with {{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}.
3. Update the replacement picture's tag, adding the tag {{Featured picture|delist/image_name}} (replace image_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the image_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/delist/image_name). Remove any no longer applicable tags from the original, replacement and from any other alternatives. If the alternatives were on Commons and no longer have any tags, be sure to tag the description page with {{missing image}}.
4. Replace the delisted Featured Picture in all articles with the new replacement Featured Picture version. Do NOT replace the original in non-article space, such as Talk Pages, FPC nominations, archives, etc.
5. Ensure that the replacement image is included on the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs. Do this by replacing the original image with the new replacement image; do not add the replacement as a new Featured Picture.

Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:

1. Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}} to the top of the section.
2. Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the archived delist nominations. This is done by simply adding the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}} to the bottom of the appropriate section of the archive.
3. If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.

Nominations in this category have already been closed and are here for the purposes of closure review by FPC contributors. Please do not add any further comments or votes regarding the original nomination. If you wish to discuss any of these closures, please do so at Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates. Nominations will stay here for three full days following closure and subsequently be removed.

Dred Scottedit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2024 at 13:24:59 (UTC)

Reason

high quality portrait of an historical figure used in 11 pages

Articles in which this image appears

Dred Scott, Dred Scott v. Sandford, Timeline of events leading to the American Civil War, Birthright citizenship in the United States, Citizenship, History of Minnesota, History of St. Louis, History of St. Louis (1804–1865), Political career of Abraham Lincoln (1849–1861), Origins of the American Civil War, Portal:Minnesota

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History

Creator

Louis Schultze / Missouri History Museum, uploaded by Ooligan

• Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 13:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support -- Ooligan (talk) 14:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support -- LegalSmeagolian (talk) 15:25, 17 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 01:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 00:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support Moonreach (talk) 15:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)reply
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Zdroj:https://en.wikipedia.org?pojem=Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates
Text je dostupný za podmienok Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0 Unported; prípadne za ďalších podmienok. Podrobnejšie informácie nájdete na stránke Podmienky použitia.

---