The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:13, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Muhabbat Gumshuda Meri (TV series)

Muhabbat Gumshuda Meri (TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This TV drama clearly fails to meet GNG as I couldn't even find ROTM coverage in RS besides some namechecks coverage. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 19:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 19:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

*Keep - A WP:NTV series meets WP:GNG, substantial sources, free images available on Google search. Have million of views on YouTube. Popular in South Asian region as well. Rather than WP:AfD, should have been tagged for "Additional Citations".Sameeerrr (talk) 10:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC) ( Blocked sockpuppet)

• • Sameeerrr, NTV is an essay and you have to provide WP:THREE best coverage that you believe is sufficient to meet GNG. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
• Delete - The only references that discuss it at length are NEWSORGINDIA so not reliable. Having "free images available on Google Search," "million of views on YouTube," or "popular in South Asian region" is not a policy based reason to keep. @Sameeerrr:, I would invite you to add the "additional citations" you feel it should be tagged for. If you are able to do so I will take a look as maybe I missed something in my search. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:33, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

  Hey CNMall41, added multiple citations which I found on Google search and referred as "Additional Citations" in my vote. I'll look for more tomorrow morning in the local language search. Sameeerrr (talk) 20:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

And which ones do NOT fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA as they are all churnalism with the exception of one. Looking closer, this page looks more like a way to promote a film for Khushhal Khan (actor), not surprisingly both pages were heavily worked on by undisclosed paid editors. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

BBC News, Independent Urdu, NDTV are WP:RS. Not sure if it's a way to promote XYZ actor or promotion by a UPE. I added "Additional Citation" which I was asked for. Sameeerrr (talk) 20:50, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Please review WP:NEWSORGINDIA. I am questioning which SPECIFIC link does not fall under that criteria. These are all reliable publications but the specific sources are not. There is a difference when evaluating that guideline. Also note that adding more sources is not helping as it only clutters the page and those attempting to evaluate. It is the quality of the sources that matter. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

I'm supporting my vote here prevalent to "Additional Citations". WP:NEWSORGINDIA isn't what I'm concerned about, that's your opinion and I respect it. IMO, sources added are adequate enough to establish WP:GNG. Sameeerrr (talk) 09:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Sameeerrr, Why don't you provide THREE best sources that you believe should be sufficient to meet GNG? —Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

While I do appreciate your desire to keep this page, "additional citations" is not a criteria for Wikipedia notability. Without pointing out the requested citations that show notability, I would not be able to change my vote. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:23, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

I didn't ask you to change your vote @CNMall41.Sameeerrr (talk) 18:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply

• Delete per nom lacks in-depth coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.