Hello, Petextrodon!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:40, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Sri Lanka Armed Forces and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Cossde (talk) 13:03, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

This request has been declined as premature. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 13:42, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Cossde (talk) 16:46, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

This request has been declined as premature. For the Arbitration Committee, –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 17:06, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Cossde (talk) 06:47, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

DRN has been reopened at my request. Cossde (talk) 15:58, 21 June 2023 (UTC)reply

Hi! Thanks for the article, it's rare you get the chance to review a new article of that quality and scope! I added in a couple of links - for instance, the sixth Buddhist council has its own article with more detail (some of which might contribute to this article, much of which is clearly totally unnecessary), which might be useful for readers. I'd be careful of over-citing, typically you only need one or two citations to back up a statement, four gets a little excessive and the citation style you've chosen, while perfectly appropriate, can make it hard to chase down facts - you'd be better off (IMHO) using one citation for each assertion/fact in a paragraph rather than pack 'em all in at the end of the para. That's really important in an article like this, which deals with highly contentious issues and events and where you want to not only maintain NPOV but be seen to maintain it, too - and be able to defend it. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:34, 26 July 2023 (UTC)reply

Hey, thanks a lot for reviewing my article, really appreciate that. it might have been forgotten in the backlog for a long time otherwise. Your advice is noted. I will try to make the necessary edits where appropriate. cheers -- Petextrodon (talk) 06:12, 26 July 2023 (UTC)reply

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:1985 Vavuniya massacre. Thanks! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:24, 5 August 2023 (UTC)reply

I've now removed the links to copyrighted content. -- Petextrodon (talk) 02:14, 5 August 2023 (UTC)reply

1985 Vavuniya massacre, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cabrils (talk) 02:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)reply

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Cossde (talk) 14:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC)reply

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Cossde (talk) 00:44, 21 February 2024 (UTC)reply

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Oz346 (talk) 01:23, 7 March 2024 (UTC)reply

A Request for Amendment has been filed with the Arbitration Committee to extend the contentious topics designation to Sri Lanka for the case currently designated India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:02, 19 March 2024 (UTC)reply

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Designating_Sri_Lanka_as_a_contentious_topic and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Cossde (talk) 01:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)reply

The Arbitration case request Designating Sri Lanka as a contentious topic has been resolved by motion. The enacted motion designates Sri Lanka, broadly construed, as a contentious topic. For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 14:42, 20 April 2024 (UTC)reply

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Use of single and primary sources in Sri Lankan Civil War articles and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Cossde (talk) 05:47, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply

This case request has been declined. The report at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard is still open and you may comment there. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 14:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)reply

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Petextrodon. Thank you.

I encourage you to retract some of your more personal comments at Talk:Tamil genocide. Talk pages are for discussions of content, not for casting aspersions at other editors.

If you have evidence to suspect that Kalanishashika is a sock-puppet account evading a topic ban, please file a complaint at SPI. Walsh90210 (talk) 17:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply

Ok fine.---Petextrodon (talk) 17:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply

Thanks. I noticed that Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cossde was already filed; in my view the behavioral evidence is stronger now than it was then. Perhaps another admin should review that case? How would one ask for that? Walsh90210 (talk) 18:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply