A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | CH | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
Favour?When you get the chance, could you possibly do a GA review for Hoodoo Gurus - now occupying the top of the GAN music queue. That's normally where I look first, but I nominated, so I come to my partner in crime. :) Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 08:28, 7 March 2008 (UTC) SFU peer reviewThank you for your comments! I will keep those suggestions in mind when I next edit the page. Dark Executioner (talk) 19:03, 7 March 2008 (UTC) Hey, I've joined WP:SLAYER. I also ot a really good start on Slayer discography. I don't know as much about the band as you do, so could you write a brief bio of the band in the lead? I'm not sure if you are familiar with discographies but you can look at the ones listed on WP:HMM if you need help. Cheers, —Burningclean 11:17, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi mate, I hope all is well. Since the above is likely to pass FLC, can you amend the classification parameters at WP:SLAYER? It isn't an article, so isn't an FAC. If it passes FLC though, there's currently no parameters for FLs. LuciferMorgan (talk) 08:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Hoodoo Gurus GA review part 1editHoodoo Gurus Lead has been re-written in accordance with your comments at Talk:Hoodoo Gurus. More refs inserted. Formation re: who plays what added; quote incorporated into prose with ref; last.fm ref deleted. I believe major issues raised in your part 1 review have been addressed.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 04:12, 10 March 2008 (UTC) part 2editI think I've covered the majority of part 2 (except "My Girl" video & significance of the dog). Greater detail at Talk:Hoodoo Gurus.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 07:24, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
part 3editI think Dan Arndt and I have covered nearly every point you raised in Part 3. Some small fiddling with refs might still be needed if you're not happy with the new ones supplied. If so, could the hold status (due to run out March 16?) be extended to allow us to find more suitable ones. Speaking for myself, I am unlikely to do any more work on the Hoodoo Gurus article over the weekend.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 04:57, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Damage Plan - Wake Up.oggeditThanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Damage Plan - Wake Up.ogg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:05, 13 March 2008 (UTC) Re: Dave LombardoeditYeah, it'd be great to get Lombardo to FA. I'll keep my eye on the FAC, and help where possible. Having said that, it'd be better to concentrate on one FA at a time. I heard A7X and Atreyu don't see eye to eye, and as for BFMV... well, they're from Bridgend - an hour on the bus from my location. Oddly enough, didn't even notice your message. LuciferMorgan (talk) 09:23, 14 March 2008 (UTC) "Irreplaceable"editIm here again. The peer review on this was already closed. I've seeked help from other users and, fortunately, LuciferMorgan did a review and copyedited the article. Is it up for FAC now or any problems? --Efe (talk) 08:00, 16 March 2008 (UTC) Just passed the article. Comments/Supports/Opposes are welcomed. --Efe (talk) 07:10, 17 March 2008 (UTC) SYLeditHi! Would you look at the Strapping Young Lad article, it's currently at peer review, if you happen to have some free time? And, of course, interested in bringing this up to FA level. Thanks. Gocsa (talk) 21:53, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
DevilDrivereditHi mate. Just thought I'd pop in and say that the article needs a minor cleanup, more specifically two recently added items of news in one section. LuciferMorgan (talk) 22:47, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
GA Review : Hoodoo GuruseditWell all the dead links have been fixed or replaced - all the points raised in your last review (part 3) I believe have been addressed - so hopefully we have an article that meets the grade - appreciate all the work you've done to date in giving a good critical review. If you think there is anything else left to do - let us know. Dan arndt (talk) 00:02, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
TriviumeditHey dude, I got most of Trivium done. The first section is in need of a rewrite as well as the lead. I'll leave you and J Milburn to do a little work, otherwise it isn't a collaberation. Cheers, —Burningclean Speak the truth! 00:58, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Barnstaredit | ||||||||||||||
