Archives (Index)

2024/March 2024/February 2024/April

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
355		Epitaph Records (talk)	Add sources
220		Fecal Matter (band) (talk)	Add sources
1,561		Social science (talk)	Add sources
831		Riot grrrl (talk)	Add sources
148		Edgware (talk)	Add sources
271		Teen pop (talk)	Add sources
252		2020s in music (talk)	Cleanup
6		University of South Florida College of Nursing (talk)	Cleanup
15		Calestous Juma (talk)	Cleanup
187		With the Lights Out (talk)	Expand
3,196		Taylor Hawkins (talk)	Expand
52		The New America (talk)	Expand
56		Nirvana bootleg recordings (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
65		War of the Breton Succession (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
202		Apple IIGS (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
852		Barn owl (talk)	Merge
178		Western barn owl (talk)	Merge
137		Troodontidae (talk)	Merge
79		Jung Hye-young (talk)	Wikify
82		COVID-19 misinformation by governments (talk)	Wikify
154		Recall (memory) (talk)	Wikify
4		Uniform Advantage and AACN Nursing Scholarship (talk)	Orphan
200		Areas of Colombo (talk)	Orphan
2		Amarapu Satyanarayana (talk)	Orphan
26		The News (song) (talk)	Stub
81		The Antisocial Network (film) (talk)	Stub
2		Mastostethus (talk)	Stub
10		Berothidae (talk)	Stub
24		Overhook (talk)	Stub
37		Harpiinae (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:40, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Get There (Bôa album). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:04, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Gotcha. I'm gonna be fully honest, as soon as I made that page I realized that there are little to no sources on it, which sucks. Thanks for notifying me! The Sharpest Lives (contribs) 14:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Get There boa album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

The article Punk Bunny Coffee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article reads like an advertisement, and I can barely find any sources following the name change.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Sharpest Lives (the deadliest to lead) 14:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi The Sharpest Lives, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)reply

I had a look at the article myself plus its review page, and I think it could use a bit more comments.

• The NFUR for the sample can be improved, and you might want to be a bit more stringent in that regard when reviewing. IMO "most ambitious" is not a helpful description that can be intuited using a sample, and more concrete commentary on the composition should be the focus instead if samples are to be used on music articles.
• In reviews, you should also make sure to look at:
  • the article's concision, part of criterion 1a (e.g. the two uses of "It was announced" and the statement "It peaked at No. 1 on the Australian Music Radio Airplay Project (AMRAP) Metro Charts, remaining in that position for two weeks" can be trimmed)
  • the lead (where is the description of the album's lyrics and music?)
  • and use of quotations (many of the lineson the critical reception section can be paraphrased).
• For more general advice, if you are reviewing a song or album article, it helps to look at similar articles that are already GAs to see what such an article should or should not have.

Other than that, I think you have a good grasp of the other criterion so far. Good work on pointing out possible copyvio, taking the time to assess the use of visual and aural media, and asking about the use of primary sources. PSA 🏕️🪐 (please make some noise...) 03:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply

(Well it's not yet the 8th but might not be online tomorrow so pretend it is the 8th or read it again on the 8th.)

Happy Account Creation Day! On 8 June 2023 you created this account. A major step into your Wikipedian journey. It has been a year and I'd like to say....

Thanks for your stellar contributions and I hope to see you around Soapforduck(Say what?)(Did what?) 08:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply

I didn't even realize! Wow... one year already. Good job catching that and thanks so much!!! The Sharpest Lives (the deadliest to lead) 16:22, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply

Hello, I noticed you have an article listed at WP:GAN. I recently started a project, Good Article Review Circles, and thought you might be interested. This initiative helps articles get reviewed more quickly through collaborative efforts. By joining, you'll review others' articles and get your own reviewed in return. Check out the page for more details! — GMH Melbourne (talk) 14:53, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply

Hello The Sharpest Lives, You have been paired at good article review circles to review In the Darkest of Nights, Let the Birds Sing. At the same time, Joeyquism, will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC/Circles#Circle #1.

GMH Melbourne (talk) 08:59, 8 June 2024 (UTC)reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Growing Up (The Linda Lindas album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Joeyquism -- Joeyquism (talk) 06:02, 9 June 2024 (UTC)reply

The article Growing Up (The Linda Lindas album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Growing Up (The Linda Lindas album) and Talk:Growing Up (The Linda Lindas album)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Joeyquism -- Joeyquism (talk) 20:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)reply

The article Growing Up (The Linda Lindas album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Growing Up (The Linda Lindas album) for comments about the article, and Talk:Growing Up (The Linda Lindas album)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Joeyquism -- Joeyquism (talk) 22:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)reply