This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Stations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Television stations task force. Korea Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, paulmnguyen, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 16 February 2013. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!

This page is very hard to understand at the moment, I will do my best to improve grammar and punctuation. MeanMotherJr (talk) 22:47, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Most of this article consists of a series of lists. Is this acceptable? Or should we be trying to turn it into proper prose? (I'm too new to Wikipedia to know the best way to go with this one!) RuthLivingstone (talk) 08:03, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Agree I think the lists themselves fall off the WP:Notable standard... they are uncited, as well. Perhaps the "Chronology" section could be reduced to major dates and expressed in prose with sources. Definitely not ready for a copy-edit. Paul M. Nguyen (chat|blame) 02:51, 17 February 2013 (UTC)