Prime-counting function - Biblioteka.sk

Upozornenie: Prezeranie týchto stránok je určené len pre návštevníkov nad 18 rokov!
Zásady ochrany osobných údajov.
Používaním tohto webu súhlasíte s uchovávaním cookies, ktoré slúžia na poskytovanie služieb, nastavenie reklám a analýzu návštevnosti. OK, súhlasím


Panta Rhei Doprava Zadarmo
...
...


A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | CH | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9

Prime-counting function
 ...

In mathematics, the prime-counting function is the function counting the number of prime numbers less than or equal to some real number x.[1][2] It is denoted by π(x) (unrelated to the number π).

The values of π(n) for the first 60 positive integers

Growth rate

Of great interest in number theory is the growth rate of the prime-counting function.[3][4] It was conjectured in the end of the 18th century by Gauss and by Legendre to be approximately

where log is the natural logarithm, in the sense that
This statement is the prime number theorem. An equivalent statement is
where li is the logarithmic integral function. The prime number theorem was first proved in 1896 by Jacques Hadamard and by Charles de la Vallée Poussin independently, using properties of the Riemann zeta function introduced by Riemann in 1859. Proofs of the prime number theorem not using the zeta function or complex analysis were found around 1948 by Atle Selberg and by Paul Erdős (for the most part independently).[5]

More precise estimates

In 1899, de la Vallée Poussin proved that [6]

for some positive constant a. Here, O(...) is the big O notation.

More precise estimates of π(x) are now known. For example, in 2002, Kevin Ford proved that[7]

Mossinghoff and Trudgian proved[8] an explicit upper bound for the difference between π(x) and li(x):

For values of x that are not unreasonably large, li(x) is greater than π(x). However, π(x) − li(x) is known to change sign infinitely many times. For a discussion of this, see Skewes' number.

Exact form

For x > 1 let π0(x) = π(x) − 1/2 when x is a prime number, and π0(x) = π(x) otherwise. Bernhard Riemann, in his work On the Number of Primes Less Than a Given Magnitude, proved that π0(x) is equal to[9]

Riemann's explicit formula using the first 200 non-trivial zeros of the zeta function

where
μ(n) is the Möbius function, li(x) is the logarithmic integral function, ρ indexes every zero of the Riemann zeta function, and li(xρ/n) is not evaluated with a branch cut but instead considered as Ei(ρ/n log x) where Ei(x) is the exponential integral. If the trivial zeros are collected and the sum is taken only over the non-trivial zeros ρ of the Riemann zeta function, then π0(x) may be approximated by[10]

The Riemann hypothesis suggests that every such non-trivial zero lies along Re(s) = 1/2.

Table of π(x), x/log(x), and li(x)

The table compares exact values of π(x) to the two approximations x / log x and li(x). The last column, x / π(x), is the average prime gap below x.

Zdroj:https://en.wikipedia.org?pojem=Prime-counting_function
Text je dostupný za podmienok Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0 Unported; prípadne za ďalších podmienok. Podrobnejšie informácie nájdete na stránke Podmienky použitia.






Text je dostupný za podmienok Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0 Unported; prípadne za ďalších podmienok.
Podrobnejšie informácie nájdete na stránke Podmienky použitia.

Your browser doesn’t support the object tag.

www.astronomia.sk | www.biologia.sk | www.botanika.sk | www.dejiny.sk | www.economy.sk | www.elektrotechnika.sk | www.estetika.sk | www.farmakologia.sk | www.filozofia.sk | Fyzika | www.futurologia.sk | www.genetika.sk | www.chemia.sk | www.lingvistika.sk | www.politologia.sk | www.psychologia.sk | www.sexuologia.sk | www.sociologia.sk | www.veda.sk I www.zoologia.sk


x π(x) π(x) − x/log(x) li(x) − π(x) x/log(x)
 % error
li(x)
 % error
x/π(x)
10 4 0 2 8.22% 42.606% 2.500
102 25 3 5 14.06% 18.597% 4.000
103 168 23 10 14.85% 5.561% 5.952
104 1,229 143 17 12.37% 1.384% 8.137
105 9,592 906 38 9.91% 0.393% 10.425
106 78,498 6,116 130 8.11% 0.164% 12.739
107 664,579 44,158 339 6.87% 0.051% 15.047
108 5,761,455 332,774 754 5.94% 0.013% 17.357
109 50,847,534 2,592,592 1,701 5.23% 3.34×10−3 % 19.667
1010 455,052,511 20,758,029 3,104 4.66% 6.82×10−4 % 21.975
1011