A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | CH | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
Experiments directed toward developing fusion power are invariably done with dedicated machines which can be classified according to the principles they use to confine the plasma fuel and keep it hot.
The major division is between magnetic confinement and inertial confinement. In magnetic confinement, the tendency of the hot plasma to expand is counteracted by the Lorentz force between currents in the plasma and magnetic fields produced by external coils. The particle densities tend to be in the range of 1018 to 1022 m−3 and the linear dimensions in the range of 0.1 to 10 m. The particle and energy confinement times may range from under a millisecond to over a second, but the configuration itself is often maintained through input of particles, energy, and current for times that are hundreds or thousands of times longer. Some concepts are capable of maintaining a plasma indefinitely.
In contrast, with inertial confinement, there is nothing to counteract the expansion of the plasma. The confinement time is simply the time it takes the plasma pressure to overcome the inertia of the particles, hence the name. The densities tend to be in the range of 1031 to 1033 m−3 and the plasma radius in the range of 1 to 100 micrometers. These conditions are obtained by irradiating a millimeter-sized solid pellet with a nanosecond laser or ion pulse. The outer layer of the pellet is ablated, providing a reaction force that compresses the central 10% of the fuel by a factor of 10 or 20 to 103 or 104 times solid density. These microplasmas disperse in a time measured in nanoseconds. For a fusion power reactor, a repetition rate of several per second will be needed.
Magnetic confinement
Within the field of magnetic confinement experiments, there is a basic division between toroidal and open magnetic field topologies. Generally speaking, it is easier to contain a plasma in the direction perpendicular to the field than parallel to it. Parallel confinement can be solved either by bending the field lines back on themselves into circles or, more commonly, toroidal surfaces, or by constricting the bundle of field lines at both ends, which causes some of the particles to be reflected by the mirror effect. The toroidal geometries can be further subdivided according to whether the machine itself has a toroidal geometry, i.e., a solid core through the center of the plasma. The alternative is to dispense with a solid core and rely on currents in the plasma to produce the toroidal field.
Mirror machines have advantages in a simpler geometry and a better potential for direct conversion of particle energy to electricity. They generally require higher magnetic fields than toroidal machines, but the biggest problem has turned out to be confinement. For good confinement there must be more particles moving perpendicular to the field than there are moving parallel to the field. Such a non-Maxwellian velocity distribution is, however, very difficult to maintain and energetically costly.
The mirrors' advantage of simple machine geometry is maintained in machines which produce compact toroids, but there are potential disadvantages for stability in not having a central conductor and there is generally less possibility to control (and thereby optimize) the magnetic geometry. Compact toroid concepts are generally less well developed than those of toroidal machines. While this does not necessarily mean that they cannot work better than mainstream concepts, the uncertainty involved is much greater.
Somewhat in a class by itself is the Z-pinch, which has circular field lines. This was one of the first concepts tried, but it did not prove very successful. Furthermore, there was never a convincing concept for turning the pulsed machine requiring electrodes into a practical reactor.
The dense plasma focus is a controversial and "non-mainstream" device that relies on currents in the plasma to produce a toroid. It is a pulsed device that depends on a plasma that is not in equilibrium and has the potential for direct conversion of particle energy to electricity. Experiments are ongoing to test relatively new theories to determine if the device has a future.
Toroidal machine
Toroidal machines can be axially symmetric, like the tokamak and the reversed field pinch (RFP), or asymmetric, like the stellarator. The additional degree of freedom gained by giving up toroidal symmetry might ultimately be usable to produce better confinement, but the cost is complexity in the engineering, the theory, and the experimental diagnostics. Stellarators typically have a periodicity, e.g. a fivefold rotational symmetry. The RFP, despite some theoretical advantages such as a low magnetic field at the coils, has not proven very successful.
Tokamak[1]1">edit
Device name | Status | Construction | Operation | Location | Organisation | Major/minor radius | B-field | Plasma current | Purpose | Image |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T-1 (Tokamak-1)[2] | Shut down | 1957 | 1958–1959 | Moscow | Kurchatov Institute | 0.625 m/0.13 m | 1 T | 0.04 MA | First tokamak | |
T-2 (Tokamak-2)[2] | Recycled →FT-1 | 1959 | 1960–1970 | Moscow | Kurchatov Institute | 0.62 m/0.22 m | 1 T | 0.04 MA | ||
T-3 (Tokamak-3)[2] | Shut down | 1960 | 1962–? | Moscow | Kurchatov Institute | 1 m/0.12 m | 3.5 T | 0.15 MA | Overcame Bohm diffusion by a factor of 10, temperature 10 MK, confinement time 10 ms | |
T-5 (Tokamak-5)[2] | Shut down | ? | 1962–1970 | Moscow | Kurchatov Institute | 0.625 m/0.15 m | 1.2 T | 0.06 MA | Investigation of plasma equilibrium in vertical and horizontal direction | |
TM-1 | Shut down | ? | ? | Moscow | Kurchatov Institute | |||||
TM-2 | Shut down | ? | 1965 | Moscow | Kurchatov Institute | |||||
TM-3 | Shut down | ? | 1970 | Moscow | Kurchatov Institute | |||||
FT-1[2] | Recycled →CASTOR | T-2 | 1972–2002 | Saint Petersburg | Ioffe Institute | 0.62 m/0.22 m | 1.2 T | 0.05 MA | ||
ST (Symmetric Tokamak) | Shut down | Model C | 1970–1974 | Princeton | Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory | 1.09 m/0.13 m | 5.0 T | 0.13 MA | First American tokamak, converted from Model C stellarator | |
T-6 (Tokamak-6) | Shut down | ? | 1970–1974 | Moscow | Kurchatov Institute | 0.7 m/0.25 m | 1.5 T | 0.22 MA | ||
TUMAN-2, 2A | Shut down | ? | 1971–1985 | Saint Petersburg | Ioffe Institute | 0.4 m/0.08 m | 1.5 T | 0.012 MA | ||
ORMAK (Oak Ridge tokaMAK) | Shut down | 1971–1976 | Oak Ridge | Oak Ridge National Laboratory | 0.8 m/0.23 m | 2.5 T | 0.34 MA | First to achieve 20 MK plasma temperature | ||
Doublet II | Shut down | 1972–1974 | San Diego | General Atomics | 0.63 m/0.08 m | 0.95 T | 0.21 MA | 1 | ||
ATC (Adiabatic Toroidal Compressor) | Shut down | 1971–1972 | 1972–1976 | Princeton | Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory | 0.88 m/0.11 m | 2 T | 0.05 MA | Demonstrate compressional plasma heating | |
T-9 (Tokamak-9) | Shut down | ? | 1972–1977 | Moscow | Kurchatov Institute | 0.36 m/0.07 m | 1 T | |||
TO-1 | Shut down | ? | 1972–1978 | Moscow | Kurchatov Institute | 0.6 m/0.13 m | 1.5 T | 0.07 MA | ||
Alcator A (Alto Campo Toro) | Shut down | ? | 1972–1978 | Cambridge | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | 0.54 m/0.10 m | 9.0 T | 0.3 MA | ||
JFT-2 (JAERI Fusion Torus 2) | Shut down | ? | 1972–1982 | Naka | Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute | 0.9 m/0.25 m | 1.8 T | 0.25 MA | ||
Turbulent Tokamak Frascati (TTF, torello) | Shut down | 1973 | Frascati | ENEA | 0.3 m/0.04 m | 1 T | 0.005 MA | Study of turbulent plasma heating | 2 | |
Pulsator[3] | Shut down | 1970–1973 | 1973–1979 | Garching | Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics | 0.7 m/0.12 m | 2.7 T | 0.125 MA | Discovery of high-density operation with tokamaks | 3 |
TFR (Tokamak de Fontenay-aux-Roses) | Shut down | 1973–1984 | Fontenay-aux-Roses | CEA | 0.98 m/0.2 m | 6 T | 0.49 MA | 4 | ||
T-4 (Tokamak-4)[2] | Shut down | ? | 1974–1978 | Moscow | Kurchatov Institute | 0.9 m/0.16 m | 5 T | 0.3 MA | Observed fast thermal quench before major plasma disruptions | |
Doublet IIA | Shut down | 1974–1979 | San Diego | General Atomics | 0.66 m/0.15 m | 0.76 T | 0.35 MA | |||
Petula-B | Shut down | ? | 1974–1986 | Grenoble | CEA | 0.72 m/0.18 m | 2.7 T | 0.23 MA | ||
T-10 (Tokamak-10)[2] | Operational | 1975– | Moscow | Kurchatov Institute | 1.50 m/0.37 m | 4 T | 0.8 MA | Largest tokamak of its time | ||
T-11 (Tokamak-11) | Shut down | ? | 1975–1984 | Moscow | Kurchatov Institute | 0.7 m/0.25 m | 1 T | |||
PLT (Princeton Large Torus) | Shut down | 1972–1975 | 1975–1986 | Princeton | Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory | 1.32 m/0.42 m | 4 T | 0.7 MA | First to achieve 1 MA plasma current | |
Divertor Injection Tokamak Experiment (DITE) | Shut down | 1975–1989 | Culham | United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority | 1.17 m/0.27 m | 2.7 T | 0.26 MA | |||
JIPP T-II | Shut down | ? | 1976 | Nagoya | Nagoya University | 0.91 m/0.17 m | 3 T | 0.16 MA | ||
TNT-A | Shut down | ? | 1976 | Tokyo | Tokyo University | 0.4 m/0.09 m | 0.42 T | 0.02 MA | ||
T-8 (Tokamak-8)[2] | Shut down | ? | 1976–? | Moscow | Kurchatov Institute | 0.28 m/0.048 m | 0.9 T | 0.024 MA | First D-shaped tokamak | |
Microtor[4] | Shut down | ? | 1976–1983? | Los Angeles | UCLA | 0.3 m/0.1 m | 2.5 T | 0.12 MA | Plasma impurity control and diagnostic development | |
Macrotor[4] | Shut down | ? | 1970s–80s | Los Angeles | UCLA | 0.9 m/0.4 m | 0.4 T | 0.1 MA | Understanding plasma rotation driven by radial current | |
TUMAN-3[2] | Operational | ? | 1977– (1990–, 3M) |
Saint Petersburg | Ioffe Institute | 0.55 m/0.23 m | 3 T | 0.18 MA | Study adiabatic compression, RF and NB heating, H-mode and parametric instability | |
Thor[5] | Shut down | ? | Milano | University of Milano | 0.52 m/0.195 m | 1 T | 0.055 MA | 5 | ||
FT (Frascati Tokamak) | Shut down | 1978 | Frascati | ENEA | 0.83 m/0.20 m | 10 T | 0.8 MA | |||
PDX (Poloidal Divertor Experiment) | Shut down | ? | 1978–1983 | Princeton | Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory | 1.4 m/0.4 m | 2.4 T | 0.5 MA | ||
ISX-B | Shut down | ? | 1978–1984 | Oak Ridge | Oak Ridge National Laboratory | 0.93 m/0.27 m | 1.8 T | 0.2 MA | Superconducting coils, attempt high-beta operation | |
Doublet III | Shut down | 1978–1985 | San Diego | General Atomics | 1.45 m/0.45 m | 2.6 T | 0.61 MA | 6 | ||
T-12 (Tokamak-12) | Shut down | ? | 1978–1985 | Moscow | Kurchatov Institute | 0.36 m/0.08 m | 1 T | 0.03 MA | ||
Alcator C (Alto Campo Toro) | Shut down | ? | 1978–1986 | Cambridge | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | 0.64 m/0.16 m | 13 T | 0.8 MA | ||
T-7 (Tokamak-7)[2] | Recycled →HT-7[6] | ? | 1979–1985 | Moscow | Kurchatov Institute | 1.2 m/0.31 m | 3 T | 0.3 MA | First tokamak with superconducting toroidal field coils | |
ASDEX (Axially Symmetric Divertor Experiment)[7] | Recycled →HL-2A | 1973–1980 | 1980–1990 | Garching | Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik | 1.65 m/0.4 m | 2.8 T | 0.5 MA | Discovery of the H-mode in 1982 | 7 |
FT-2[2] | Operational | ? | 1980– | Saint Petersburg | Ioffe Institute | 0.55 m/0.08 m | 3 T | 0.05 MA | H-mode physics, LH heating | |
TEXTOR (Tokamak Experiment for Technology Oriented Research)[8][9] | Shut down | 1976–1980 | 1981–2013 | Jülich | Forschungszentrum Jülich | 1.75 m/0.47 m | 2.8 T | 0.8 MA | Study plasma-wall interactions | |
TFTR (Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor)[10] | Shut down | 1980–1982 | 1982–1997 | Princeton | Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory | 2.4 m/0.8 m | 5.9 T | 3 MA | Attempted scientific break-even, reached record fusion power of 10.7 MW and temperature of 510 MK | |
JFT-2M (JAERI Fusion Torus 2M) | Shut down | ? | 1983–2004 | Naka | Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute | 1.3 m/0.35 m | 2.2 T | 0.5 MA | 8 | |
JET (Joint European Torus)[11] | Shut down | 1978–1983 | 1983–2023 | Culham | United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority | 2.96 m/0.96 m | 4 T | 7 MA | Records for fusion output power 16.1 MW (1997), fusion energy 69 MJ (2023) | |
Novillo[12][13] | Shut down | NOVA-II | 1983–2004 | Mexico City | Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares | 0.23 m/0.06 m | 1 T | 0.01 MA | Study plasma-wall interactions | |
JT-60 (Japan Torus-60)[14] | Recycled →JT-60SA | 1985–2010 | Naka | Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute | 3.4 m/1.0 m | 4 T | 3 MA | High-beta steady-state operation, highest fusion triple product |
Zdroj:https://en.wikipedia.org?pojem=List_of_fusion_experiments Text je dostupný za podmienok Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0 Unported; prípadne za ďalších podmienok. Podrobnejšie informácie nájdete na stránke Podmienky použitia.
Analytika
Antropológia Aplikované vedy Bibliometria Dejiny vedy Encyklopédie Filozofia vedy Forenzné vedy Humanitné vedy Knižničná veda Kryogenika Kryptológia Kulturológia Literárna veda Medzidisciplinárne oblasti Metódy kvantitatívnej analýzy Metavedy Metodika Text je dostupný za podmienok Creative
Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0 Unported; prípadne za ďalších
podmienok. www.astronomia.sk | www.biologia.sk | www.botanika.sk | www.dejiny.sk | www.economy.sk | www.elektrotechnika.sk | www.estetika.sk | www.farmakologia.sk | www.filozofia.sk | Fyzika | www.futurologia.sk | www.genetika.sk | www.chemia.sk | www.lingvistika.sk | www.politologia.sk | www.psychologia.sk | www.sexuologia.sk | www.sociologia.sk | www.veda.sk I www.zoologia.sk |