Civil procedure in Australia

The rules of civil procedure in Australia govern procedure in the various courts and tribunals in Australia. Civil procedure in Australia was historically derived from, and continues to resemble, civil procedure in England and Wales. The rules vary between the different courts and tribunals.

History

Before Federation, each Australian colony had a two- or three-tiered judicial system with a Supreme Court at its apex.^[1] The colonial Supreme Courts followed the model of the Supreme Court of Judicature of England and Wales, as the High Court of Justice was known from the 1870s, when it was established by the Judicature Acts.^[2] Civil procedure in the colonial Supreme Courts was governed by rules made by the judges and known as the Rules of the Supreme Court, some of which continue in force today.^[3]

Legislation

Most states have now codified the rules of civil procedure as delegated legislation, sometimes known as Uniform Civil Procedure Rules. The Chief Justice of the relevant Supreme Court is generally the chair of a rules committee with the power to amend the rules.^[4] However, the title and structure of the relevant civil procedure rules is not uniform across jurisdictions.

For example, the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) and Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld) are quite different. In Queensland, the rules were intended to be "uniform, so far as practicable, for all three courts in the State stream"^[5] – that is, to unify the procedure of the Supreme, District and Magistrates Court, not participate in a cooperative federalism effort like the Uniform Evidence Acts.^[6]

The following legislation governs civil procedure in each jurisdiction.

Commonwealth

Commentary

Civil procedure is one of the Priestley 11 subjects which all Australian lawyers are required to study. There are a number of textbooks available, as well as regularly-updated commentaries for legal professionals.

NSW Civil Procedure Handbook 2021. Thomson Reuters.
Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure New South Wales. LexisNexis.
Principles of Civil Procedure in Victoria (2nd ed.). Thomson Reuters. 2018.
Civil Procedure Victoria. LexisNexis.
Civil Procedure Western Australia. LexisNexis.
John McKenna QC. "Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Digest". Supreme Court of Queensland.

References

^ South Australia v Totani [2010] HCA 39 .
^ Law Reform Commission of New South Wales (9 September 1969). Supreme Court procedure (PDF) (Report). p. 7. Retrieved 4 March 2022.
^ For example, the Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA).
^ Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 8; Supreme Court of Queensland Act 1991 (Qld) s 89.
^ Paul de Jersey (20 June 1999). "Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Seminar: opening and overview" (PDF).
^ Attorney-General's Department (Australia) (10 July 2015). "Uniform Evidence Acts comparative tables". Retrieved 23 July 2019.

Zdroj:https://en.wikipedia.org?pojem=Civil_procedure_in_Australia
Text je dostupný za podmienok Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0 Unported; prípadne za ďalších podmienok. Podrobnejšie informácie nájdete na stránke Podmienky použitia.

[totani-french-53-1] South Australia v Totani [2010] HCA 39 .

[nswlrc-sc-procedure-2] Law Reform Commission of New South Wales (9 September 1969). Supreme Court procedure (PDF) (Report). p. 7. Retrieved 4 March 2022.

[3] For example, the Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA).

[rules-committees-4] Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 8; Supreme Court of Queensland Act 1991 (Qld) s 89.

[de-jersey-1999-5] Paul de Jersey (20 June 1999). "Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Seminar: opening and overview" (PDF).

[agd-uniform-evidence-acts-6] Attorney-General's Department (Australia) (10 July 2015). "Uniform Evidence Acts comparative tables". Retrieved 23 July 2019.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

History

Legislation

Commonwealth

New South Wales

Queensland

South Australia

Tasmania

Victoria

Western Australia

Australian Capital Territory

Northern Territory

Commentary

See also

References