A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | CH | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
Overview | |
---|---|
Games of the XXIX Olympiad XIII Paralympic Games | |
Winner: Beijing Runner-up: Toronto Shortlist: Paris · Istanbul · Osaka | |
Details | |
Committee | IOC |
Election venue | Moscow 112th IOC Session |
Map | |
Important dates | |
First Bid | February 1, 2000 |
Second bid | June 20, 2000 |
Shortlist | August 28, 2000 |
Decision | July 13, 2001 |
Decision | |
Winner | Beijing (56 votes) |
Runner-up | Toronto (22 votes) |
Ten cities submitted bids to host the 2008 Summer Olympics and Paralympics that were recognized by the International Olympic Committee (IOC), five of which made the IOC Executive Committee's shortlist. The games were awarded to Beijing, China on July 13, 2001. The other shortlisted cities were Toronto, Paris, Istanbul and Osaka. Beijing won an absolute majority of votes after two rounds of voting, eliminating the need for subsequent rounds of voting. IOC delegates and the media identified a number of factors in its favor, including the size of the country, improvements in Chinese anti-doping enforcement, and its close loss to Sydney, Australia eight years earlier.[1] In that bidding process, which chose the host city for the 2000 Summer Olympics, Beijing led every round of voting but lost in the final round to Sydney by two votes.[2]
A number of politicians and non-governmental organizations criticized the Beijing bid and its selection due to concerns about China's human rights record. In response, supporters of the Beijing bid suggested that hosting the games might lead to "progress" on human rights and other issues. Some IOC delegates also expressed concerns about air pollution and heat in Beijing during the summer, and its effects on athletes participating in the games. In order to address such concerns, the Beijing bid included plans to reduce both air and water pollution in the city in advance of the games.[1]
Bidding process
The Olympic bidding process begins with the submission of a city's application to the International Olympic Committee (IOC) by its National Olympic Committee (NOC) and ends with the election of the host city by the members of the IOC during an ordinary session. The process is governed by the Olympic Charter, as stated in Chapter 5, Rule 34.[3]
The bidding process for the 2008 Summer Olympics was the first in which the process consisted of two phases. Subsequent bidding processes have followed the same model. During the first phase, which begins immediately after the bid submission deadline, the "applicant cities" are required to answer a questionnaire covering themes of importance to a successful Games organisation. This information allows the IOC to analyse the cities' hosting capacities and the strengths and weaknesses of their plans. Following a detailed study of the submitted questionnaires and ensuing reports, the IOC Executive Board selects the cities that are qualified to proceed to the next phase. The second phase is the true candidature stage: the accepted applicant cities (from now on referred to as "candidate cities") are required to submit a second questionnaire in the form of an extended, more detailed, candidature file.[4] These files are carefully studied by the IOC Evaluation Commission, a group composed of IOC members, representatives of international sport federations, NOCs, athletes, the International Paralympic Committee, and international experts in various fields.[5] The members of the Evaluation Commission then make four-day inspection visits to each of the candidate cities, where they check the proposed venues and are briefed about details of the themes covered in the candidature file. The Evaluation Commission communicates the results of its inspections in a report sent to the IOC members up to one month before the electing IOC Session.[4]
Part of a series on |
2008 Summer Olympics |
---|
Part of a series on |
2008 Summer Paralympics |
---|
The IOC Session in which a host city is elected takes place in a country that did not submit an application to stage the Olympics.[4] The election is made by the assembled active IOC members (excluding honorary and honour members), each possessing one vote. Members from countries that have a city taking part in the election cannot vote while the city is in the running. The voting is conducted in a succession of rounds until one bid achieves an absolute majority of votes; if this does not happen in the first round, the bid with the fewest votes is eliminated and another voting round begins. In the case of a tie for the lowest number of votes, a special runoff vote is carried out, with the winner proceeding to the next round. After each round, the eliminated bid is announced.[6][7] Following the announcement of the host city, the successful bid delegation signs the "Host City Contract" with the IOC, which delegates the responsibilities of the Games organisation to the city and respective NOC.[8]
Potential applicant cities
A number of cities expressed some interest in bidding or were mentioned as potential bidders for the 2008 Summer Olympics, but did not do so. These bids were not internally selected by the NOC (in case of more than one bidding city from the same country), were not put forward to the IOC, were withdrawn before filing the necessary paperwork, or never rose above speculation. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil received early funding to develop a bid for the 2008 Games but instead decided to bid for the 2012 games.[9] Cape Town, South Africa and Buenos Aires, Argentina lost bids for the 2004 Summer Olympics and media reports suggested they might shift their bids to the 2008 Games, although they did not.[10] Monterrey, Mexico was in the earliest stages of organizing a bid but did not complete the process. Other cities hinted at submitting bids or were mentioned as possible bidders in media reports but did not do so, including: Lisbon, Portugal; Krasnaya Polyana, Russia; a joint Israel/Palestinian bid;[9] New York City, United States;[11] Prague, Czech Republic; Busan, South Korea; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (Vancouver was bidding for the 2010 Winter Olympics); and Moscow, Russia.[10]
Evaluation of applicant cities
Ten cities applied to host the 2008 Summer Olympics. Applicant cities were required to submit responses to a written questionnaire by June 20, 2000. They were also given documents outlining the selection process and the IOC's Code of Ethics.[12] The IOC Candidature Acceptance Working Group analyzed the responses and quantified the applicant's potential to be a host city based on eleven criteria: government support and public opinion, general infrastructure, sports infrastructure, olympic village, environmental conditions and impact, accommodation, transport, security, experience from past sports events, finance, and the general concept. Each of these criteria was given a weight which was then used to calculate an overall score for that applicant city. If a city did not get a final score of at least 6 out of 10, they would not be recommended for candidature.[13]
In its final report, the Candidature Acceptance Working Group recommended only four cities as meeting the minimum standard for being a host city, as denoted by a score of 6 on their scale. These cities were Beijing, China; Osaka, Japan; Paris, France; and Toronto, Ontario, Canada.[13] The IOC Executive Committee received this report and met on August 28, 2000 to decide which applicant cities would become candidate cities.[12] When they met, the Executive Committee chose to promote five cities to candidature, the four recommended by the Working Group as well as Istanbul, Turkey. As stipulated, the IOC granted them the right to use the Olympic rings on their candidature emblem, together with a label identifying each as a Candidate City. The following five cities which submitted bids did not make the IOC's short list:[14]
- Bangkok, Thailand
- Cairo, Egypt
- Havana, Cuba
- Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Seville, Spain
Criteria | Weight | Bangkok | Beijing | Cairo | Havana | Istanbul | Kuala Lumpur | Osaka | Paris | Seville | Toronto | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THA | CHN | EGY | CUB | TUR | MAS | JPN | FRA | ESP | CAN | ||||||||||||
Min | Max | Min | Max | Min | Max | Min | Max | Min | Max | Min | Max | Min | Max | Min | Max | Min | Max | Min | Max | ||
Accommodation | 5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 9.8 | 10.0 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 3.2 | 3.9 | 5.9 | 6.5 | 5.1 | 5.4 | 9.6 | 9.8 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 3.6 | 3.9 | 7.7 | 7.9 |
Environmental conditions and impact | 2 | 4.3 | 6.2 | 5.3 | 6.8 | 2.8 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 5.3 | 5.8 | 7.2 | 3.0 | 4.8 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 5.0 | 6.8 | 7.5 | 8.2 |
Experience from past sports events | 2 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 4.5 | 6.5 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 9.5 | 7.5 | 8.5 | 7.0 | 8.5 |
General infrastructure | 5 | 1.5 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 5.4 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 3.7 | 4.6 | 4.5 | 6.7 | 7.1 | 8.0 | 7.6 | 8.5 | 3.5 | 5.0 | 6.3 | 7.6 |
Government support, public opinion | 1 | 5.3 | 6.0 | 6.8 | 7.4 | 5.4 | 6.1 | 5.3 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.7 | 5.1 | 5.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.8 | 7.5 |
Olympic Village | 4 | 5.3 | 6.8 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 4.4 | 6.5 | 6.8 | 8.1 | 5.5 | 7.2 | 5.3 | 6.8 | 5.8 | 8.2 | 7.2 | 8.7 | 7.2 | 8.6 | 5.9 | 8.0 |
General concept | 3 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 8.0 |
Security | 3 | 5.4 | 7.3 | 6.4 | 7.7 | 4.9 | 6.4 | 6.3 | 7.0 | 5.7 | 7.1 | 6.1 | 7.1 | 7.4 | 8.7 | 7.0 | 8.4 | 6.6 | 7.9 | 8.0 | 9.0 |
Sports infrastructure | 4 | 3.6 | 5.9 | 6.3 | 7.9 | 3.1 | 6.3 | 2.0 | 5.3 | 5.9 | 7.9 | 3.1 | 4.6 | 6.0 | 8.0 | 7.2 | 8.5 | 6.5 | 7.8 | 7.2 | 8.6 |
Transport infrastructure | 4 | 3.7 | 5.4 | 6.3 | 7.6 | 3.7 | 4.7 | 3.6 | 5.3 | 6.1 | 7.6 | 5.6 | 7.4 | 6.9 | 7.9 | 7.7 | 9.0 | 4.2 | 6.4 | 7.5 | 8.7 |
Evaluation of candidate cities
Each of the five candidate cities was then evaluated by the IOC's fourteen member Evaluation Commission, chaired by Hein Verbruggen. These evaluations included site visits to each of the host cities and analysis of each city's potential across 18 themes. The four-day-long visits occurred between February 21 and March 28, 2001, with visits to each specific city on the following dates:[15]
- Beijing — February 21–24
- Osaka — February 26–March 1
- Toronto — March 8–11
- Istanbul — March 21–24
- Paris — March 26–29
The Commission attempted to identify any major risks the IOC would be taking if each city were chosen to host the Games. In its final report, the Commission refrained from ranking each of the cities or identifying a favorite. Instead, they identified three cities as excellent candidates; Beijing, Paris, and Toronto. In effect, the commission recommended each of these cities equally. In rejecting Istanbul, they expressed concerns about the ability of the city to coordinate financing and construction of infrastructure. In particular, they were concerned that the plans for transportation infrastructure improvements would be difficult to achieve. Osaka was also not rated excellent due to concerns about financing and traffic congestion.[14]
Their report was submitted to the IOC President and Executive Committee on May 15, 2001. Following that meeting, an anonymous document circulated that claimed IOC President Juan Antonio Samaranch had inappropriately placed pressure on the Evaluation Commission during the drafting of its report. An IOC press release on June 13, 2001 categorically denied those rumors.[16]
Final selection process
The 112th session of the IOC, where the decision about the host city took place, was held in Moscow, Russia from July 13–16, 2001. Voting on the question of the host city took place on July 13, 2001. Presentations of the candidate cities began at 9:30 AM MSK (UTC+04:00) in the Congress Hall of Moscow's World Trade Center. This was followed by the official presentation of the Evaluation Committee report to the IOC delegates and, soon after, the delegates began casting their votes.[17] Of the 122 members of the IOC at the time, 105 were eligible to vote in the first round. Members who were not present or who represented countries with candidate cities were not allowed by IOC rules to vote. However, after the elimination of a city in each round, members who had previously been barred from voting due to that city's candidacy were allowed to vote in subsequent rounds. The IOC members who were unable to vote included:[18][19]
IOC members unable to vote in the 2008 Host City Election (17) | |
---|---|
Members from countries with candidate cities (13) |
Absent members (4) |
At the end of the first round of voting, only Beijing, Toronto, Paris, and Istanbul remained; Osaka was eliminated after having received only six votes. Beijing had opened a wide lead, however, receiving more than double the number of votes received by second place Toronto. In the second round, Beijing received enough votes to have an absolute majority (possibly due to the Osaka supporters switching to its side) and no subsequent rounds of voting were required. The results of the second round were as follows: Beijing garnered 56 votes, Toronto 22, Paris 18, and Istanbul 9. According to IOC rules Beijing at that point became the official host city for the 2008 Summer Olympics. Results from the two rounds of voting were as follows:[20]
2008 Host City Election — ballot results | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
City | Country (NOC) | Round 1 | Round 2 | ||
Beijing | China | 44 | 56 | ||
Toronto | Canada | 20 | 22 | ||
Paris | France | 15 | 18 | ||
Istanbul | Turkey | 17 | 9 | ||
Osaka | Japan | 6 | — |
Bidding cities
Candidate cities
Logo | City | Country | National Olympic Committee | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
Beijing | China | Chinese Olympic Committee (CHN) | Winner | |
Beijing 2008 was the successful bid for the 2008 Summer Olympics. Eight years earlier, Beijing had put in a bid to host the 2000 Summer Olympics, losing to Sydney, Australia. The selection of Sydney was an upset, as Beijing led in the first three rounds of voting that year and lost in the final round by only two votes. The loss was despite intense lobbying of the IOC by China. News reports at the time suggested that Sydney was chosen because it was a safe choice; criticism of China's human rights record and concerns about its lack of experience in hosting major athletic events made it a risky proposition in the eyes of some IOC members.[21] By contrast, during the 2008 bid and after its selection as a host city, Chinese officials suggested that hosting the games would actually improve China's human rights record.[1] The IOC Evaluation Committee report emphasized strong public support, guarantees of construction of venues, and strong government support as strengths of the Beijing bid. They also lauded the city's plan for addressing its pollution problems, particularly with air pollution, in the lead-up to the Games.[14] | ||||
Toronto | Canada | Canadian Olympic Committee (COC) | First runner-up | |
The city of Toronto, Ontario, Canada submitted a bid for the games, and received the second most votes. Two years after Toronto lost the bid, Vancouver was later selected to host the 2010 Winter Olympics. |
||||
Paris | France
Zdroj:https://en.wikipedia.org?pojem=2008_Summer_Olympics_bids Text je dostupný za podmienok Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0 Unported; prípadne za ďalších podmienok. Podrobnejšie informácie nájdete na stránke Podmienky použitia.
Analytika
Antropológia Aplikované vedy Bibliometria Dejiny vedy Encyklopédie Filozofia vedy Forenzné vedy Humanitné vedy Knižničná veda Kryogenika Kryptológia Kulturológia Literárna veda Medzidisciplinárne oblasti Metódy kvantitatívnej analýzy Metavedy Metodika Text je dostupný za podmienok Creative
Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0 Unported; prípadne za ďalších
podmienok. www.astronomia.sk | www.biologia.sk | www.botanika.sk | www.dejiny.sk | www.economy.sk | www.elektrotechnika.sk | www.estetika.sk | www.farmakologia.sk | www.filozofia.sk | Fyzika | www.futurologia.sk | www.genetika.sk | www.chemia.sk | www.lingvistika.sk | www.politologia.sk | www.psychologia.sk | www.sexuologia.sk | www.sociologia.sk | www.veda.sk I www.zoologia.sk |